top of page
Search
Writer's pictureEdward D. Andrews
Aug 1012 min read

Can Naturalistic Theories Account for the Resurrection?

The Centrality of the Resurrection in Christian Faith


The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the cornerstone of Christian faith, a pivotal event that validates the claims of Jesus as the Son of God and the truth of the gospel. The apostle Paul emphasizes the significance of the resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15:14, stating, "And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain." This statement underscores that the truthfulness of Christianity hinges on the historical reality of the resurrection. Without it, the entire Christian faith would be rendered meaningless.


Given the importance of the resurrection, it is not surprising that skeptics have sought to explain away this event through naturalistic theories. These theories attempt to account for the resurrection without appealing to supernatural intervention, proposing alternative explanations for the empty tomb and the post-resurrection appearances of Jesus. However, when examined in light of Scripture and historical evidence, these naturalistic theories fall short of adequately explaining the resurrection.



The Swoon Theory: Did Jesus Merely Appear to Die?


One of the earliest and most enduring naturalistic theories is the swoon theory, which suggests that Jesus did not actually die on the cross but merely lost consciousness and later revived in the tomb. According to this theory, Jesus appeared to be dead, but after being placed in the tomb, He regained consciousness and escaped, leading His disciples to mistakenly believe that He had risen from the dead.


The swoon theory is fraught with numerous problems, both medically and historically. First, the Gospels provide detailed accounts of the crucifixion, emphasizing the severity of Jesus’ physical suffering and the certainty of His death. In John 19:33-34, the account states, "But when they came to Jesus and saw that he was already dead, they did not break his legs. But one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and at once there came out blood and water." The flow of blood and water from Jesus' side is consistent with the medical understanding of death by crucifixion, where the pericardial sac surrounding the heart fills with fluid, indicating that death had occurred.


Furthermore, Roman executioners were highly skilled in their craft and were unlikely to mistake a living person for a dead one. The penalty for failing to carry out an execution properly was severe, making it improbable that Jesus could have survived the crucifixion. Additionally, the idea that a severely injured man could remove the large stone sealing the tomb, overpower Roman guards, and then convince His disciples that He had triumphantly risen from the dead strains credulity.


Scripturally, the resurrection is presented as a miraculous event, not merely the resuscitation of a wounded man. In Romans 6:9, Paul declares, "We know that Christ, being raised from the dead, will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him." The resurrection is portrayed as a victory over death itself, not a temporary reprieve from it. The swoon theory fails to account for the transformative power of the resurrection, which is central to the Christian proclamation of Jesus as the risen Lord.



The Theft Theory: Did the Disciples Steal the Body?


Another naturalistic explanation is the theft theory, which proposes that the disciples of Jesus stole His body from the tomb and then fabricated the story of His resurrection. This theory is mentioned in Matthew 28:11-15, where the chief priests and elders bribed the soldiers guarding the tomb to spread the story that Jesus' disciples had stolen His body while the guards were asleep.


While the theft theory attempts to account for the empty tomb, it raises several significant issues. First, the idea that the disciples, who had fled in fear during Jesus' arrest (Matthew 26:56), would suddenly muster the courage to steal His body under the noses of Roman guards is highly implausible. These same disciples, who were initially fearful and disheartened, later became bold proclaimers of the resurrection, willing to suffer persecution and martyrdom for their testimony. It is unlikely that they would endure such hardships for what they knew to be a lie.


Moreover, the theft theory does not explain the post-resurrection appearances of Jesus to His disciples and others. In 1 Corinthians 15:5-8, Paul lists several of these appearances, noting that Jesus "appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me." These appearances are presented as objective encounters with the risen Christ, not merely subjective visions or hallucinations.


Additionally, the theft theory fails to account for the transformation of key figures such as James, the brother of Jesus, and Paul, formerly known as Saul of Tarsus. Both of these men were initially skeptics—James was a non-believer during Jesus' ministry (John 7:5), and Paul was a fierce persecutor of Christians (Acts 9:1-2). However, both became ardent followers of Christ after encountering the risen Jesus. Their radical transformation is difficult to explain if the resurrection were merely a hoax perpetrated by the disciples.



The Hallucination Theory: Were the Appearances of Jesus Hallucinations?


The hallucination theory suggests that the post-resurrection appearances of Jesus were not actual encounters with a risen Christ but rather hallucinations experienced by His disciples and other followers. According to this theory, the grief-stricken and emotionally distraught disciples desperately wanted to see Jesus alive again, and this intense desire led them to experience hallucinations of Him.


While hallucinations are a recognized psychological phenomenon, they are highly individualized and typically occur in specific circumstances, such as severe grief, stress, or mental illness. The idea that multiple individuals, including groups of people, would experience the same hallucination at the same time is extremely unlikely. As noted earlier, Paul records that Jesus appeared to more than five hundred people at one time (1 Corinthians 15:6). The likelihood of all these individuals experiencing a collective hallucination is virtually nonexistent.


Furthermore, the resurrection appearances of Jesus were not fleeting or vague visions. The Gospels describe tangible, physical encounters with Jesus, where He spoke with His disciples, allowed them to touch Him, and even ate with them. In Luke 24:39-43, Jesus invites His disciples to verify His physical resurrection: "See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself. Touch me, and see. For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have." He then eats a piece of broiled fish in their presence, further confirming that He was not a mere apparition.


The hallucination theory also fails to account for the empty tomb. Even if the disciples had hallucinated appearances of Jesus, this would not explain why the tomb was found empty. The Jewish and Roman authorities could have easily refuted the disciples' claims by producing Jesus' body, but they were unable to do so. The empty tomb, coupled with the physical resurrection appearances, points to a reality that cannot be dismissed as mere hallucination.



The Wrong Tomb Theory: Was the Resurrection Based on a Mistake?


The wrong tomb theory posits that the women who first visited Jesus' tomb on the morning of the resurrection went to the wrong tomb by mistake. According to this theory, the women found an empty tomb, assumed that Jesus had risen, and spread this belief to the other disciples. The theory suggests that the actual tomb of Jesus, which still contained His body, was simply overlooked.


This theory is easily refuted by the accounts provided in the Gospels. First, the burial of Jesus was a carefully observed and documented event. Joseph of Arimathea, a member of the Sanhedrin who had not consented to the council's decision to crucify Jesus, requested Jesus' body from Pilate and placed it in his own new tomb, which had been carved out of rock (Matthew 27:57-60). The women who followed Jesus during His ministry, including Mary Magdalene and the other Mary, were present at the burial and saw the location of the tomb (Matthew 27:61). These details indicate that the women were well aware of the tomb's location.


Moreover, the tomb was sealed with a large stone and guarded by Roman soldiers at the request of the Jewish leaders, who were concerned that Jesus' disciples might attempt to steal His body (Matthew 27:62-66). The presence of the Roman guard and the seal would have marked the tomb as the burial place of Jesus, making it highly unlikely that the women would mistakenly go to the wrong tomb.


Even if the women had gone to the wrong tomb, the Jewish and Roman authorities could have easily corrected the mistake by pointing to the correct tomb and producing Jesus' body. The fact that they did not do so suggests that the tomb was indeed empty, and that the resurrection was not based on a mere mistake.


The Twin Theory: Was There a Case of Mistaken Identity?


A more recent naturalistic theory is the twin theory, which proposes that Jesus had an identical twin brother who was separated from Him at birth. According to this theory, the twin brother appeared after Jesus' crucifixion, claiming to be the resurrected Jesus and convincing the disciples that He had risen from the dead.


This theory is highly speculative and lacks any historical or scriptural support. The Gospels provide no indication that Jesus had a twin brother, and such a significant detail would likely have been noted by the Gospel writers if it were true. Additionally, the theory fails to explain how the twin brother, who would have been a complete stranger to the disciples, could have convincingly impersonated Jesus, who had spent years in close fellowship with His followers.


Moreover, the resurrection appearances of Jesus were marked by specific, personal interactions with His disciples that would be difficult, if not impossible, for an imposter to replicate. For example, in John 20:16-18, Jesus appears to Mary Magdalene outside the tomb and calls her by name, a moment of profound recognition that would have been impossible for a twin brother to fake. Similarly, in John 21:15-19, Jesus has a detailed conversation with Peter, reinstating him after his earlier denial. The depth of these interactions suggests a level of familiarity and intimacy that could not be achieved by a stranger impersonating Jesus.


The twin theory also fails to account for the miraculous aspects of the resurrection, such as the appearance of Jesus in a locked room (John 20:19) and His ascension into heaven (Acts 1:9-11). These events, which are central to the resurrection narrative, cannot be explained by a mere case of mistaken identity.



The Spiritual Resurrection Theory: Was the Resurrection Merely a Spiritual Event?


The spiritual resurrection theory suggests that the resurrection of Jesus was not a physical event but a spiritual one. According to this theory, Jesus' body remained in the tomb, but His spirit was raised from the dead and appeared to His disciples in a non-physical form. Proponents of this theory argue that the resurrection appearances of Jesus were visionary experiences rather than encounters with a physically resurrected body.


This theory is directly contradicted by the New Testament accounts of the resurrection, which emphasize the physicality of Jesus' risen body. As mentioned earlier, Jesus invited His disciples to touch His wounds and verified His physical resurrection by eating in their presence (Luke 24:39-43). The apostle Thomas's encounter with the risen Jesus is particularly significant in this regard. In John 20:27, Jesus says to Thomas, "Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side. Do not disbelieve, but believe." This invitation to physically examine Jesus' wounds demonstrates that the resurrection was not merely a spiritual event but involved the bodily resurrection of Jesus.


The apostle Paul also affirms the physical nature of the resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15:42-44, where he contrasts the natural body with the spiritual body: "So is it with the resurrection of the dead. What is sown is perishable; what is raised is imperishable. It is sown in dishonor; it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness; it is raised in power. It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body." Paul’s use of the term "spiritual body" does not imply a non-physical existence but rather a transformed, glorified body that is suited for eternal life. The physical resurrection of Jesus serves as the prototype for the future resurrection of believers, affirming the continuity between the body that is sown and the body that is raised.


Furthermore, the early Christian proclamation of the resurrection consistently emphasized the empty tomb as evidence of Jesus' physical resurrection. The fact that Jesus' body was no longer in the tomb is a crucial element of the resurrection narrative and would be inexplicable if the resurrection were merely a spiritual event.



The Myth Theory: Was the Resurrection a Legend That Developed Over Time?


The myth theory suggests that the resurrection of Jesus was not a historical event but a legend or myth that developed over time. According to this theory, the early followers of Jesus gradually embellished the story of His death, adding miraculous elements such as the resurrection to enhance the significance of Jesus' life and ministry.


This theory is undermined by the early dating of the resurrection accounts and the presence of eyewitness testimony. The apostle Paul, writing in the mid-first century, refers to the resurrection as a well-established fact within the Christian community. In 1 Corinthians 15:3-8, Paul provides a summary of the resurrection appearances, noting that many of the eyewitnesses were still alive at the time of his writing. This early attestation to the resurrection suggests that the belief in the resurrection was not a later development but was present from the very beginning of the Christian movement.


Additionally, the Gospels, which contain detailed accounts of the resurrection, were written within the first generation of Christians, at a time when eyewitnesses to the events were still alive. The proximity of these writings to the events they describe makes it unlikely that a myth could have developed without being challenged by those who knew the truth.


The New Testament also reflects a strong commitment to the truthfulness of the resurrection accounts. The Gospel writers present the resurrection as a historical event, supported by multiple lines of evidence, including the empty tomb, the resurrection appearances, and the transformation of the disciples. The apostle Peter, in his second letter, explicitly rejects the idea that the resurrection was a cleverly devised myth, stating, "For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty" (2 Peter 1:16).


Moreover, the willingness of the apostles and early Christians to suffer persecution and martyrdom for their belief in the resurrection speaks to their conviction that the resurrection was a historical reality, not a myth. People are unlikely to willingly endure suffering and death for what they know to be a fabricated story.



The Significance of the Resurrection in Christian Theology


The resurrection of Jesus is not merely a historical event; it is a foundational doctrine that has profound theological implications for the Christian faith. The resurrection vindicates Jesus as the Son of God, confirms the truth of His teachings, and secures the salvation of believers.


In Romans 1:4, Paul declares that Jesus "was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead." The resurrection is the divine affirmation of Jesus' identity and mission, demonstrating that He is indeed the Messiah and the Savior of the world.


The resurrection also serves as the basis for the Christian hope of eternal life. In 1 Corinthians 15:20-22, Paul writes, "But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive." The resurrection of Jesus is the guarantee of the future resurrection of believers, providing assurance that death is not the end for those who are in Christ.


Furthermore, the resurrection is central to the doctrine of justification. In Romans 4:25, Paul states that Jesus "was delivered up for our trespasses and raised for our justification." The resurrection signifies that Jesus' sacrifice on the cross was accepted by God as full payment for the sins of humanity, and it is through His resurrection that believers are declared righteous before God.


Finally, the resurrection has ethical implications for the Christian life. In Romans 6:4, Paul exhorts believers, "We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life." The resurrection empowers believers to live transformed lives, free from the bondage of sin and enabled to pursue holiness through the power of the Holy Spirit.



Conclusion


The naturalistic theories that attempt to account for the resurrection of Jesus Christ fail to provide a coherent or satisfactory explanation for the historical and biblical evidence. The swoon theory, theft theory, hallucination theory, wrong tomb theory, twin theory, spiritual resurrection theory, and myth theory all fall short when subjected to careful scrutiny. In contrast, the biblical account of the resurrection stands as a well-attested and theologically rich event that is central to the Christian faith.


The resurrection is not only a historical reality but also a profound theological truth that affirms Jesus as the risen Lord, provides hope for eternal life, and calls believers to live in the power of the resurrection. As the apostle Paul declared in 1 Corinthians 15:57, "But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ."


About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220 books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).


RECOMMENDED READING


17 views0 comments

Comments

bottom of page