top of page
Writer's pictureEdward D. Andrews

How Can the Bible Affirm Both Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom?

The Biblical Foundation for Divine Sovereignty


The Bible consistently affirms the sovereignty of God over all creation. This sovereignty encompasses His supreme authority and power to govern all things according to His will. Psalm 103:19 declares, "Jehovah has established his throne in the heavens, and his kingdom rules over all." This verse encapsulates the biblical view of God's overarching rule over the universe. Similarly, Ephesians 1:11 states that God "works all things according to the counsel of his will," indicating that everything ultimately aligns with His divine purposes.


Throughout Scripture, God's sovereignty is evident in His creation, providence, and salvation. In creation, Genesis 1:1 states, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth," asserting God's authority over the physical universe. In providence, passages like Matthew 10:29-31 illustrate God's meticulous care for His creation, where even the fall of a sparrow is within His sovereign control. In salvation, Ephesians 2:8-9 emphasizes that salvation is a gift from God, not a result of human works, highlighting God's initiative and authority in the process.


Human Freedom in Scripture


While the Bible upholds God's sovereignty, it also affirms human freedom and responsibility. The concept of free will is integral to the biblical narrative, where humans are depicted as moral agents capable of making genuine choices. Deuteronomy 30:19 presents a clear instance of this: "I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live." Here, God appeals to the Israelites to choose obedience, indicating their capacity for making moral decisions.


In the New Testament, Jesus' invitation in Matthew 11:28-30, "Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest," demonstrates the element of choice in responding to God's call. Similarly, Revelation 3:20 pictures Jesus standing at the door and knocking, waiting for individuals to open the door and receive Him, further underscoring the role of human volition.



Reconciling Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom


Reconciling divine sovereignty and human freedom involves understanding the nature of God's foreknowledge and the distinction between causation and knowledge. The concept of simple foreknowledge posits that God knows everything, including future contingent events, but this knowledge does not causally determine those events. This view is supported by Scriptures that depict God's foreknowledge without implying coercion or predetermination.


Romans 8:29 states, "For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son," suggesting that God's foreknowledge precedes His predestining activity. This implies that God's knowledge of future events is based on their actual occurrence rather than being the cause of their occurrence.


The Analogy of the Barometer


An effective analogy to understand this relationship is the infallible barometer. A barometer predicts the weather accurately without causing it. Similarly, God's foreknowledge is like an infallible barometer of the future. It lets Him know what the future holds but does not constrain or determine it. The future unfolds according to the free choices of moral agents, and God's foreknowledge tracks these choices perfectly.



Biblical Examples of Foreknowledge and Human Choice


The Bible provides several examples that illustrate the harmony between God's foreknowledge and human freedom. One notable instance is the story of Joseph in Genesis 37-50. Despite his brothers' evil intentions in selling him into slavery, Joseph later acknowledges God's sovereign plan: "As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good" (Genesis 50:20). This narrative demonstrates how human actions, freely chosen, can align with God's sovereign purposes without negating human responsibility.


Another example is the prophecy concerning Peter's denial of Jesus. In Matthew 26:34, Jesus predicts, "Truly, I tell you, this very night, before the rooster crows, you will deny me three times." Peter's denial was a free act, yet it fulfilled Jesus' foreknowledge. This shows that God's foreknowledge of events does not undermine human freedom but rather coexists with it.


Theological Implications


The theological implications of affirming both divine sovereignty and human freedom are profound. It ensures that God remains the sovereign ruler over His creation while humans retain their moral responsibility. This balance maintains the integrity of biblical teachings on God's nature and human agency.


From a pastoral perspective, this understanding provides comfort and assurance. Believers can trust in God's sovereign control over their lives, knowing that He works all things for their good (Romans 8:28). At the same time, they are encouraged to live responsibly, making choices that align with God's will.



Philosophical Considerations


Philosophically, the compatibility of divine sovereignty and human freedom can be understood through the concept of Molinism, named after the 16th-century theologian Luis de Molina. Molinism posits that God possesses middle knowledge—He knows what free creatures would do in any given circumstance. This allows God to sovereignly orchestrate events without violating human freedom.


Molinism aligns with biblical examples where God's foreknowledge and human choices coexist. It affirms that God, in His infinite wisdom, can incorporate human decisions into His sovereign plan without compromising His control or human freedom.


Practical Applications


Understanding the relationship between divine sovereignty and human freedom has practical applications for Christian living. It calls believers to trust in God's providence while taking responsibility for their actions. Proverbs 16:9 captures this balance: "The heart of man plans his way, but Jehovah establishes his steps." Believers are encouraged to make wise decisions, knowing that God ultimately guides their paths.


This understanding also fosters humility and dependence on God. Recognizing that God's ways are higher than human ways (Isaiah 55:8-9) leads to a posture of surrender and trust. Believers are reminded that, despite their freedom, they are dependent on God's grace and guidance in every aspect of life.



Scriptural Insights on God's Sovereignty and Human Freedom


The interplay between divine sovereignty and human freedom is further illuminated by examining specific scriptural passages. For instance, Jeremiah 18:1-6 portrays God as the potter and Israel as the clay. While God shapes and directs the nation according to His purposes, the people's response to His guidance remains a matter of their free choice. This imagery underscores the balance between God's sovereign plan and human response.


In the New Testament, Acts 2:23 provides a profound example: "This Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men." Here, Peter acknowledges that Jesus' crucifixion was part of God's sovereign plan, yet it involved the free actions of human agents. This dual affirmation of divine sovereignty and human responsibility is foundational to the Christian understanding of salvation history.


The Role of Prayer in the Context of Sovereignty and Freedom


Prayer is another area where the balance between divine sovereignty and human freedom plays a significant role. The Bible encourages believers to pray, assuring them that their prayers are heard and can influence outcomes (James 5:16). Yet, these prayers are offered within the context of God's sovereign will. Jesus' prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane exemplifies this: "My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as you will" (Matthew 26:39).


Prayer reflects a dynamic relationship between God and His people, where human petitions are considered within God's sovereign plan. It emphasizes the responsibility of believers to seek God's will while trusting in His ultimate wisdom and authority.



The Importance of Theological Balance


Maintaining a theological balance between divine sovereignty and human freedom is crucial for a coherent Christian worldview. Emphasizing one at the expense of the other can lead to theological distortions. Overemphasizing divine sovereignty may result in fatalism, where human actions are seen as inconsequential. Conversely, overemphasizing human freedom can undermine the biblical portrayal of God's control and purpose in history.


A balanced theology affirms that God is both sovereign and relational. He governs the universe with absolute authority while engaging with His creation in a meaningful and personal way. This balance is essential for a robust and biblically faithful understanding of God's nature and human agency.



Conclusion


The Bible affirms both divine sovereignty and human freedom, presenting a complex yet coherent view of God's relationship with His creation. Through careful examination of scriptural evidence and theological reflection, believers can appreciate the harmony between God's sovereign control and human responsibility. This understanding fosters trust in God's providence, encourages responsible living, and deepens the believer's relationship with the Creator.


By recognizing the limitations of human understanding and embracing the mystery of God's ways, Christians can navigate the tension between sovereignty and freedom with faith and humility. This balanced perspective enriches the Christian faith, providing a solid foundation for understanding God's work in the world and the believer's role in His redemptive plan.


About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220+ books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).


RECOMMENDED READING


Comments


bottom of page