Oct 258 min read

How Do Apologetic Responses Address Objections to the Proofs for God's Existence?

The existence of God has long been a subject of deep philosophical, theological, and scientific debate. Christian apologetics aims to defend the rationality of belief in God by addressing common objections to traditional proofs for His existence. In doing so, believers can engage skeptics and critics, presenting a case that rests not merely on faith but on logical, moral, and experiential grounds. Apologists must engage with various philosophical arguments—such as the cosmological, teleological, moral, and ontological arguments—while providing responses to objections that arise from atheism, agnosticism, and naturalism. In addressing these concerns, a clear defense of the biblical understanding of God is put forth, grounded in scriptural authority and reason.

BATTLE PLANS: A Game Plan for Answering Objections to the Christian Faith

Buy Now

What Are the Common Objections to the Cosmological Argument?

The cosmological argument posits that everything that begins to exist has a cause, and since the universe began to exist, it must have a cause outside of itself, which is God. This argument finds its basis in passages such as Genesis 1:1, which declares, "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." However, critics often raise objections to this argument, particularly in light of scientific and philosophical developments.

Can the Universe Be Eternal?

One common objection is the claim that the universe may be eternal, negating the need for a cause. However, modern scientific discoveries, particularly the Big Bang theory, affirm that the universe had a definite beginning. The concept of an eternal universe contradicts current cosmological evidence, which points to a singular starting point. Furthermore, the idea of an eternal past presents logical problems, such as the impossibility of traversing an infinite series of events to arrive at the present.

The Bible affirms that the universe is not eternal. Psalm 102:25-27 speaks of the heavens and the earth as perishable, while God remains eternal: "Of old you laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands. They will perish, but you will remain." This scripture underscores the biblical view that creation is temporal, and only God is eternal.

What About Quantum Mechanics and Uncaused Events?

Another objection comes from quantum mechanics, where certain interpretations suggest that particles can arise without a cause. However, this is a misunderstanding of quantum physics, which operates within a framework of laws and probabilities. Even if certain events seem uncaused from a human perspective, they still occur within the boundaries of a finely tuned universe governed by physical laws. The cosmological argument asserts that the universe as a whole must have an external cause, not that every single event within the universe requires a direct and identifiable cause.

Paul’s declaration in Acts 17:24-25 reaffirms the theistic view that God is the ultimate cause of all things: "The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by man, nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything." This emphasizes that God, as Creator, is the necessary and sufficient cause of the universe's existence.

THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS: for Pastors, Teachers, and Believers

Buy Now

How Do Apologetics Respond to Objections to the Teleological Argument?

The teleological argument, or the argument from design, asserts that the universe’s complexity and order point to an intelligent Designer. Psalm 19:1 proclaims, "The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork." Yet, some critics object to this argument by proposing naturalistic explanations for the universe’s apparent design.

Is Design the Result of Natural Processes?

One of the most common objections to the teleological argument is the claim that natural selection and random processes can explain the complexity of life and the fine-tuning of the universe. Critics argue that the appearance of design is not evidence of actual design but rather the result of natural laws acting over billions of years.

However, natural selection explains biological complexity, but it does not account for the origin of life or the fine-tuning of the physical constants that govern the universe. The precise values of constants such as gravity, the speed of light, and the cosmological constant must be within an incredibly narrow range for life to exist. The odds of these constants being set by chance are astronomically small, leading many to conclude that an intelligent Designer is the most plausible explanation.

Scripture affirms that God is not only the Creator but also the Sustainer of the universe. Colossians 1:16-17 states, "For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible… And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together." The ongoing order and fine-tuning of the universe reflect God’s sustaining power and purposeful design.

What About the Multiverse Theory?

Another objection to the teleological argument is the multiverse theory, which posits that there are potentially infinite universes with different physical constants. In this scenario, our universe is simply one of many, and it happens to be finely tuned by chance.

However, the multiverse theory raises more questions than it answers. First, there is no empirical evidence for the existence of other universes. Second, the multiverse itself would still require an explanation. Even if infinite universes exist, why does the multiverse exist in the first place, and why does it operate under laws that allow for the creation of fine-tuned universes? The cosmological and teleological arguments combined show that even if a multiverse exists, it still points to a transcendent Creator who set it into motion.

DIFFICULTIES IN THE BIBLE: Alleged Errors and Contradictions

Buy Now

How Do Apologetics Respond to the Moral Argument’s Critics?

The moral argument for God’s existence contends that objective moral values and duties exist and are best explained by the existence of a Moral Lawgiver, namely God. Romans 2:14-15 explains that even those who do not know God’s written law still possess a moral conscience: "For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves… They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts." Yet, objections to the moral argument are often raised, particularly by moral relativists and atheists.

Can Objective Morality Exist Without God?

Some argue that objective moral values can exist without God, positing that moral values are simply a product of societal evolution or human reasoning. According to this view, human beings have developed moral codes over time through cultural and social evolution, not through divine revelation.

However, this explanation fails to account for the binding nature of moral values. If morality is merely a product of human evolution or societal consensus, then it is subjective and can change depending on cultural shifts. What is considered moral in one society may be immoral in another. Without a transcendent source, moral values would be relative, and there would be no objective basis to say that acts like murder, theft, or lying are inherently wrong. The Bible asserts that moral law is rooted in God's unchanging nature. Malachi 3:6 declares, "For I Jehovah do not change," emphasizing that God's moral standards are absolute and not subject to human opinion.

How Do We Know Moral Values Are Objective?

Another objection is the claim that moral values are not truly objective but are simply the product of human experience. This view, often associated with moral relativism, denies that there are universal moral standards that apply to all people at all times.

However, the widespread agreement on certain moral values across different cultures and time periods suggests that objective morality exists. For example, most societies have recognized that murder, theft, and lying are wrong. This universality points to an objective moral law that transcends human societies. Scripture affirms that this moral law is written on the human heart by God (Romans 2:15). It is because human beings are made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27) that they possess an inherent understanding of right and wrong.

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS: Answering the Tough Questions: Evidence and Reason in ...

Buy Now

How Do Apologists Address Criticisms of the Ontological Argument?

The ontological argument, as formulated by Anselm of Canterbury, argues that the very concept of a maximally great being implies the existence of such a being. Critics, however, often dismiss this argument as purely conceptual, with no bearing on reality.

Is the Ontological Argument Merely a Logical Trick?

One common objection to the ontological argument is that it is nothing more than a clever wordplay that does not prove the existence of God in reality. Critics argue that simply defining God as a "maximally great being" does not necessitate His existence outside the mind.

However, the ontological argument hinges on the nature of existence itself. It posits that existence is a necessary attribute of a maximally great being, for a being that exists in reality is greater than one that exists only in the mind. Anselm’s argument is not simply defining God into existence but rather demonstrating that the concept of God entails His existence. If God is the greatest conceivable being, then He must exist because non-existence would be a limitation, contradicting the very nature of a maximally great being.

The Bible supports this view of God as the ultimate, necessary being. Exodus 3:14 records God’s self-revelation to Moses: "I AM WHO I AM." This declaration affirms God's self-existence and independence from creation. God is not a contingent being but the necessary foundation of all that exists.

REASON MEETS FAITH: Addressing and Refuting Atheism's Challenges to Christianity

Buy Now

What Is the Apologetic Response to Objections Based on the Problem of Evil?

The problem of evil is one of the most commonly cited objections to the existence of an all-powerful, all-loving God. Skeptics argue that the presence of evil and suffering in the world is incompatible with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent deity.

How Can Evil Exist if God Is Good?

Critics of theism often claim that if God were truly good and all-powerful, He would prevent evil and suffering from occurring. The fact that evil exists, they argue, is evidence that either God does not exist, or He is not truly good or powerful.

Christian apologists respond to this objection by pointing out that God’s allowance of evil and suffering does not negate His goodness or omnipotence. The Bible teaches that evil entered the world through human free will. In Genesis 3, Adam and Eve’s rebellion against God introduced sin and suffering into creation. This original act of disobedience corrupted the perfect world God had created and resulted in the fallen state of humanity and the natural world.

However, God has not left the world without hope. Scripture reveals that God uses suffering for a greater purpose, ultimately working all things for good for those who love Him (Romans 8:28). Furthermore, God has provided a solution to the problem of evil through Jesus Christ, whose death and resurrection offer redemption and the promise of a future world free from pain and suffering (Revelation 21:4).

About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220 books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).