top of page
Search
Writer's pictureEdward D. Andrews
Oct 128 min read

How Does Evolution Challenge the Biblical View of Creation?

The theory of evolution has been one of the most contested scientific ideas among Christians, particularly for those who hold to a literal interpretation of Scripture. Richard Dawkins, a prominent evolutionist, once claimed, "Evolution is as much a fact as the heat of the sun." However, while the heat of the sun is observable and measurable, many aspects of evolutionary theory remain speculative, particularly when it comes to macroevolution.


To evaluate the credibility of evolution from a biblical perspective, it is essential to differentiate between observable changes within a species (often termed "microevolution") and the grander claims of evolution that suggest all life originated from a single common ancestor (macroevolution). Scripture provides a clear account of creation, revealing Jehovah as the Creator of "kinds" (Genesis 1:21). A careful examination of both Scripture and the claims of evolutionary science is necessary to determine whether evolution can truly stand up to the light of biblical truth.



Microevolution and Macroevolution: Are They the Same?


One of the major distinctions made in evolutionary theory is between microevolution and macroevolution. Microevolution refers to small changes within a species, such as the selective breeding of dogs to produce a variety of breeds. This type of change is observable, as small variations in traits can result from genetic mutations or environmental factors.


However, the larger claim of evolution—macroevolution—asserts that these small changes can accumulate over billions of years to result in entirely new species. According to Darwinian evolution, simple organisms eventually evolved into complex beings, such as fish evolving into amphibians or apelike creatures evolving into humans. Yet, despite the bold assertions of evolutionists, macroevolution remains speculative. There is no direct observation of one kind of organism evolving into another kind over time.


Genesis 1:25 states, "And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds." The term "kind" is broader than the modern classification of species, but it is clear that God created distinct groups of organisms with the ability to reproduce within their kinds. This biblical teaching runs counter to the idea of one kind evolving into another, which is the core premise of macroevolution.



The Role of Mutations in Evolution: Do They Lead to New Species?


Evolutionists claim that mutations—random changes in an organism's genetic code—provide the raw materials necessary for macroevolution. In the 1930s, scientists believed that artificially induced mutations could accelerate the process of evolution, resulting in new and improved species. However, decades of research have proven otherwise.


A century of mutation studies has shown that while mutations can cause changes within a species, they do not create new species. In fact, most mutations are either harmful or neutral. As researcher Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig notes, "Mutations cannot transform an original species [of plant or animal] into an entirely new one." This is consistent with the Bible's teaching that God created life to reproduce "according to their kinds" (Genesis 1:11-12).


The claim that mutations could eventually lead to new species lacks scientific support. If highly trained scientists cannot produce new species through induced mutations, it is unreasonable to believe that unguided, random mutations could result in the diversity of life observed today.



Natural Selection: Is It a Creative Force?


Natural selection is often presented as a driving mechanism for evolution. Charles Darwin observed that in nature, organisms best suited to their environments are more likely to survive and reproduce. While this observation is valid, it does not explain the origin of entirely new species. Darwin’s finches, often cited as evidence for natural selection, demonstrate variation within a species, but they remain finches. The beak sizes of these finches may change depending on environmental conditions, but such changes are temporary and reversible.


Genesis 1:24 emphasizes that God created animals to reproduce "according to their kinds." The changes observed within species through natural selection do not result in new kinds of organisms. Instead, they reflect the adaptability of organisms within the boundaries set by their created kinds. This is why Darwin's finches remain finches, even after many generations of selective pressures.


Evolutionary biologists themselves have begun to question whether natural selection can account for the diversity of life. Jeffrey H. Schwartz, an evolutionary theorist, acknowledges that natural selection may help species adapt to their environments, but it does not create new species. The changes within species observed through natural selection are limited to variations that already exist within the gene pool, confirming the biblical account of creation rather than the evolutionary model.



The Fossil Record: Does It Support Evolution?


One of the strongest challenges to macroevolution comes from the fossil record. Evolutionists claim that the fossil record documents the gradual evolution of life from simple organisms to complex beings. However, the actual evidence tells a different story. The fossil record shows sudden appearances of fully formed organisms with little to no evidence of transitional forms.


Niles Eldredge, an evolutionary paleontologist, has noted that the fossil record does not show a gradual accumulation of changes, as Darwin had predicted. Instead, "species appear in the sequence very suddenly, show little or no change during their existence in the record, then abruptly go out of the record." This phenomenon is referred to as "stasis," where species remain unchanged for long periods, followed by sudden extinction or disappearance. This pattern aligns more closely with the biblical account of special creation than with the gradual changes proposed by Darwinian evolution.


For example, the so-called Cambrian explosion refers to a period in the fossil record where a wide variety of complex life forms appear suddenly without any apparent evolutionary precursors. Evolutionary biologists, such as Stuart Newman, have acknowledged that the sudden appearance of novel life forms challenges traditional Darwinian mechanisms. Genesis 1:20-23 describes God creating diverse forms of life in the seas and the skies during the fifth day of creation. The sudden appearance of complex life in the Cambrian period fits this biblical narrative far better than the gradual process proposed by macroevolution.



The Human Fossil Record: Is There Evidence of Human Evolution?


Another controversial aspect of evolutionary theory is the claim that humans evolved from apelike ancestors. Evolutionists often point to fossil evidence as proof that humans and apes share a common ancestor. However, upon closer examination, the fossil record provides little conclusive evidence for this claim.


The so-called human "family tree" is filled with uncertainty and debate among evolutionary scientists. Robin Derricourt of the University of New South Wales, Australia, stated in 2009, "Perhaps the only consensus now is that there is no consensus" when it comes to classifying human fossils. Despite the sensationalized media reports of "missing links," the fossil evidence remains inconclusive.


Many of the fossils used to support the theory of human evolution consist of fragmentary remains, such as isolated teeth or single bones. Complete skeletons are rare, and even when new fossils are discovered, there is often disagreement about their significance. Furthermore, depictions of so-called "ape-men" in textbooks and museums are highly speculative. Forensic expert Carl N. Stephan has noted that facial reconstructions of early human ancestors are likely to be biased and inaccurate.


Genesis 1:26-27 makes it clear that humans were created uniquely in the image of God: "Then God said, 'Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.'" The Bible teaches that humans are distinct from animals, created with moral and spiritual capacities that reflect God's character. The absence of conclusive evidence for human evolution from apelike ancestors supports the biblical view that humans did not evolve but were specially created by God.



The Role of Materialism in Evolutionary Theory


One of the underlying assumptions of evolutionary theory is materialism—the belief that everything in the universe can be explained by natural processes without any need for supernatural intervention. Richard Lewontin, an evolutionary biologist, candidly admitted that many scientists are committed to materialism, stating that they "cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." This philosophical bias against the possibility of a Creator influences the interpretation of scientific evidence.


Sociologist Rodney Stark has observed that in research universities, religious scientists often feel pressured to keep their beliefs hidden. There is a pervasive idea in the scientific community that to be truly scientific, one must reject religious explanations for the origin of life. This bias has led many scientists to interpret the evidence for evolution in ways that exclude the possibility of intelligent design.


Romans 1:20-21 explains that the evidence for God's existence and power is clearly seen in creation: "For his invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made." The complexity and order found in the natural world point to a Creator, not to random, unguided processes. The commitment to materialism among many evolutionary scientists prevents them from acknowledging the evidence for design in creation.



Is Belief in Evolution an Act of Faith?


Evolution is often presented as a fact, but when examined closely, it becomes clear that belief in macroevolution requires a significant amount of faith. Despite a century of research, there is no direct evidence that mutations and natural selection can produce entirely new species. The fossil record, far from supporting gradual evolution, shows the sudden appearance of fully formed organisms. The human fossil record remains inconclusive, with no clear evidence of a transition from apelike creatures to humans.


The Bible provides a coherent and consistent account of the origin of life. Genesis 1:1 states, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." The complexity of life, the stability of species, and the sudden appearance of life forms in the fossil record all point to a Creator who designed life according to His purpose. Belief in evolution, on the other hand, requires faith in a materialistic process that has yet to be proven.


As Christians, we can confidently affirm the biblical account of creation, knowing that the evidence of science, when properly interpreted, supports the truth of God's Word. Evolution, with its unproven assumptions and philosophical biases, cannot provide a satisfactory explanation for the diversity and complexity of life. Instead, the Bible's revelation of Jehovah as the Creator offers a clear and compelling explanation for the origin of life.


About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220 books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).



RECOMMENDED READING


9 views0 comments

Comments

bottom of page