top of page
Search
Writer's pictureEdward D. Andrews
12 minutes ago8 min read

What Does Chemical Evolution Claim About the Origin of Life?

Chemical evolutionists assert that life originated spontaneously from nonliving matter through purely natural processes. This belief suggests that, over billions of years, natural laws such as chemical reactions and environmental factors like lightning strikes gave rise to the first living organisms. The claim centers around experiments such as the famous Urey-Miller experiment, which aimed to replicate the conditions of early Earth and showed that basic building blocks of life, like amino acids, could form under specific conditions.


The underlying assumption of chemical evolution is that life began without any intelligent intervention, relying solely on random processes and time. This stands in direct contrast to the biblical account of creation, where God is described as the intentional and intelligent Creator of life. Genesis 1:1 begins with, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth,” which sets the stage for a theistic worldview where Jehovah's direct action is the source of all life, not chance or blind natural processes.



Can Life Really Arise from Nonlife?


One of the greatest scientific challenges to chemical evolution is the concept that life could spontaneously arise from nonlife—a concept known as abiogenesis. According to the Bible, life was purposefully created by Jehovah: "Jehovah God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul" (Genesis 2:7). This act of creation is presented as an intelligent and purposeful event, rather than a random process.


Louis Pasteur, the renowned scientist, demonstrated through his experiments that life does not spontaneously arise from nonlife. His experiments involved sterilizing containers to kill bacteria, showing that without contamination, no new life emerged. This directly counters the ancient, erroneous belief in spontaneous generation, which suggested that life could spring forth from nonliving material. Pasteur’s work established a foundational principle in biology: life only comes from preexisting life, a principle that still stands strong in scientific understanding today.


If life does not arise from nonlife under natural circumstances, then how can the origin of life be explained without intelligent intervention? The Bible provides a clear answer: “For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him” (Colossians 1:16). This highlights that creation was a deliberate act by a divine Creator, not the result of random chemical processes.



The Urey-Miller Experiment: Did It Prove Life Can Arise Spontaneously?


In the 1950s, scientists Harold Urey and Stanley Miller conducted an experiment to simulate what they believed were the conditions of early Earth. By passing an electrical discharge through a mixture of gases, they produced amino acids, the basic building blocks of proteins and life. At the time, this was hailed as significant evidence that life could arise through natural processes.


However, the Urey-Miller experiment, while interesting, did not demonstrate the spontaneous generation of life. Amino acids are not living organisms. They are simply chemicals, and the experiment did not produce anything resembling a living cell. Moreover, the conditions used in the experiment, particularly the absence of oxygen, do not reflect what scientists now believe were the actual conditions of early Earth. Oxygen would have destroyed the amino acids produced, which raises the question: Was this experiment a valid reflection of the supposed “primordial soup” in which life began?


Romans 1:20 says, "For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse." The complexity and design evident in even the simplest forms of life point to a Designer. The intricate information encoded in DNA and the organized functions within cells speak of intentionality, not randomness.



Can Mutations and Natural Selection Account for the Complexity of Life?


Evolutionary theory depends heavily on mutations and natural selection to explain the complexity of life. According to this view, random mutations in the genetic code over time, combined with natural selection, gradually produce new species and increasingly complex organisms. However, there are significant problems with this explanation when applied to the origin of life.


Mutations are random changes in the genetic code, and the overwhelming majority of mutations are either neutral or harmful to the organism. Very rarely do mutations provide any beneficial changes, and even then, these changes are typically small and do not lead to the creation of entirely new species. Research over the past century has shown that mutations cannot produce the level of complexity required for new species to evolve. As scientist Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig concluded after decades of studying mutation genetics, "Mutations cannot transform an original species into an entirely new one."


Genesis 1:24 states, "And God said, 'Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds: livestock and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds.'" This passage emphasizes that God created life according to distinct kinds. There is no biblical support for the idea that one kind of organism evolves into an entirely different kind through random mutations or natural selection. Instead, life was created with order and purpose, each kind designed to reproduce according to its own kind.



The Role of Specified Complexity in Life's Origin


One of the most compelling arguments against chemical evolution is the concept of specified complexity, which refers to the intricate and purposeful arrangement of parts in biological systems. The DNA molecule, for example, contains an enormous amount of information, comparable to an encyclopedia. This information is not random but highly organized, specifying how proteins are to be built and how cells function. The existence of such a complex system points directly to an intelligent cause.


In Romans 1:19-20, the Apostle Paul speaks of the evidence of God’s existence in creation: "For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made." This passage affirms that the natural world reveals God's wisdom and power, and the specified complexity found in DNA is one such example of this revelation.


The principle of analogy (also called uniformity) is a tool often used in scientific reasoning. It suggests that we can understand past events by comparing them to processes observed in the present. For instance, whenever we observe a complex code, whether in written language, computer programming, or DNA, we know it was created by an intelligent agent. We have no examples of codes arising through random processes. Therefore, by analogy, the information in DNA must have been created by an intelligent cause.



The Failure of Naturalistic Explanations for Life's Origin


Chemical evolutionists have proposed numerous theories to explain how life could arise through natural processes. Some suggest that life originated in deep-sea thermal vents, while others propose that life was brought to Earth by meteorites. However, all of these explanations fail to address the fundamental issue: How did nonliving matter give rise to the specified complexity and organization found in living cells?


Without a mechanism to explain how raw energy could be harnessed to create life, these naturalistic theories fall short. The Bible gives a clear and sufficient explanation: "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" (Genesis 1:1). Life did not arise by accident or through undirected natural processes. It was the result of God's intelligent design and purposeful action.



The Irreducible Complexity of Life


Michael Behe’s concept of irreducible complexity further challenges the naturalistic explanations for life’s origin. Irreducible complexity refers to biological systems that require multiple parts to function. If one part is removed, the entire system ceases to work. This is a significant problem for evolutionary theory because it implies that these systems could not have evolved gradually. All the necessary components must be present and fully functional from the beginning.


For example, the bacterial flagellum, a microscopic "motor" that allows bacteria to swim, consists of multiple interacting parts. If any one of these parts is missing, the flagellum does not function. According to Darwinian evolution, such complex systems should not exist because natural selection can only work on gradual improvements. Yet, these systems do exist, suggesting that they were intelligently designed.


Psalm 139:14 declares, "I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made." The complexity and design of living organisms inspire awe and point directly to a Creator who designed life with purpose and intentionality.



What Role Does Information Theory Play in the Origin of Life?


Information theory further supports the argument for intelligent design in the origin of life. Information, as encoded in DNA, is distinct from mere chemical reactions. It represents a highly organized and specific set of instructions necessary for life to exist and function. Information does not arise from random processes. It requires an intelligent source to create and organize that information into a meaningful system.


The Bible teaches that God is a God of order: "For God is not a God of confusion but of peace" (1 Corinthians 14:33). This order is reflected in the natural world, where we see the laws of physics, the fine-tuning of the universe, and the intricate design of biological systems. All these point to an intelligent Creator who designed life according to His divine purpose.



The Limitations of Chemical Evolution


The more we learn about life at the molecular level, the more apparent it becomes that naturalistic explanations for life’s origin are inadequate. Chemical evolution fails to account for the specified complexity, the irreducible complexity, and the vast amount of information present in living organisms. The naturalistic assumption that life could arise from nonlife is contradicted by both scientific evidence and biblical revelation.


In contrast, the Bible provides a coherent and satisfying explanation for the origin of life. It teaches that life was intentionally created by Jehovah, who designed the universe and everything in it with purpose and wisdom. Proverbs 3:19-20 says, "Jehovah by wisdom founded the earth; by understanding He established the heavens; by His knowledge the deeps broke open, and the clouds drop down the dew."


Life’s complexity and design are not the result of random processes or blind chance. They are the work of a Creator who is both powerful and intelligent. The failure of chemical evolution to explain life’s origin highlights the truth of Scripture: "For His invisible attributes, namely, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made" (Romans 1:20).


In conclusion, the overwhelming evidence points to the reality that life was created by Jehovah, not through random chemical processes. The origin of life cannot be explained by natural laws alone. Instead, it bears the unmistakable marks of intelligent design, confirming the truth of God's Word.


About the Author

EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. He has authored over 220 books. In addition, Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV).



RECOMMENDED READING


2 views0 comments

Comments

bottom of page